Santa Fe Rape Crisis & Trauma Treatment Center
en Espanol
About SFRCC
If you are assaulted
Prevention + Education
How you can help
For survivors of sexual abuse or assault
For the familes/friends/partners of survivors
For male survivors
Rape is a crime
Same-gender sexual assault
Homophobia is sexual violence
When drugs are used to rape
Giving
Sponsors
Links + Resources
SFRCC Volunteer and Employment Opportunities
Events
Home
Toll Free Hotline: 1.800.721.RAPE or 1800 721.7232
Mission StatementCommitment to DiversityFundersPrograms
C O U R T   M O N I T O R S  P R O G R A M

Beginnings

The Court Monitors Program was established in 1997 as part of the ongoing campaign of the Santa Fe Rape Crisis & Trauma Treatment Center and the League of Women Voters of Santa Fe County to see justice served in cases of sexual violence. Initially, eight League members, under the leadership coordinator from the Rape Crisis Center, volunteered to attend, observe and gather data on every case of felony sexual assault charges in Rio Arriba, Los Alamos, and Santa Fe Counties. Over the past four years, Court Monitors, carrying distinctive red clipboards, have attended over 111 cases of sexual assault in both juvenile and criminal court. Our team of court observers has grown to 19 and has included men as well as women. Since 1997, Court Monitors have become a consistent presence in the First Judicial District courtrooms, appearing at arraignments, plea hearings, trials, and sentencings. We enthusiastically share with the community our initial findings and comments based upon this court experience.

Why Monitor the Courts?

Without public awareness, inconsistencies and problems in the courts are easily ignored. This can promote a silent permissivness around the crimes of sexual violence. By being a presence in the courtroom, the Court Monitors Program hopes to hold the justice system accountable for how it processes these crimes.

We monitor the courts in order to:
  • identify where the changes in the law need to be made and to work to bring about those legislative changes;
  • gather data on all aspects of the criminal court system and to use that data to offer practical suggestions and solutions for the improvement of that system;
  • promote public awareness about the criminal justice system and how it delivers justice to both the victim and the accused in cases of sexual violence. By sharing our courtroom experience through newsletters, forums, conferences and trainings, the Court Monitors Program opens the doors of a judicial process that is rarely seen by the rest of the community, thereby educating voters and potential jurors;
  • maintain a position of neutrality in a process that is, by its nature, adversarial. In doing so, we remain accessible to concerned professionals representing all sides of the legal community for open and frank discussion regarding problems in the criminal justice system and possible solutions.

For more information regarding the Court Monitors Program
or to become a volunteer,
call Maria Jose Rodriquez Cadiz, Coordinator,
at (505) 988-1951 ext. 28.


O V E R V I E W

In the past two years, 131 females and 9 males went to the St. Vincent Hospital and SFRCC's Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner/Sexual Assault Recovery Team (SANE/SART) unit. All reported being sexually assaulted. Of these victims, 51% we under 18 years of age.

Only 16% of these victim's alleged assailants were indicted in District I Court in 1998 and 1999. These numbers add local specifics to the national statistics. Most rapes go unreported; of those that are reported, fewer than 20% of the cases go to court. The public, therefore, has little knowledge of the magnitude of the sexual assault problem. We know that without the reporting of a rape and the subsequent prosecution of the alleged assailant, perpetrators who victimize the women, children, and men of our community remain free on our streets and in our homes, without punishment or treatment.

A total of 88 new sex offense cases were opened and monitored by the Court Monitors in 1998 and 1999. This is an average of 3.6 cases per month. In criminal court in 1999 there was a decrease from 1998 of 35% in new cases opened and in juvenile court there was an increase of 73% in the juvenile cases opened in 1999. At year-end 1999, 28 cases in both crminal and juvenile courts were still in process. In addition, there were 8 open cases with outstanding warrants, meaning the defendants are in flight and have not shown up for the scheduled hearings.


C R I M I N A L   C O U R T

Jury Trials
Twenty criminal cases were closed in 1999. Thirty percent of the cases were brought to trial, an increase of 21% over 1998. In half of the trials the jury brought back a verdict of not guilty on all counts. Another case is scheduled to be re-tried after the jury found the defendant not guilty on one count and a hung jury on the two remaining counts. In two cases the defendants were found guilty on all counts, one of whom was sentenced to life because it included a murder in the first-degree charge. The other defendant was sentenced to 15 years (with a suspension of 13 years 11 months).

Nature of Charges

Of the original charges filed in the indictments 21% were for 1st degree Criminal Sexual Penetration, 36% were for 2nd and 3rd degree Criminal Sexual Penetration, and 43% were for 3rd and 4th degree Criminal Sexual Contact.

Plea Bargaining

Of the remaining 14 closed cases, 43% were resolved by plea agreements where the original charges were lowered. Two of these plea agreements dropped the sexual felony charges in favor of lower charges of a non-sexual nature, such as Contributing to the Deliquency of a Minor or False Imprisonment, which are 4th degree felony charges. In 29% of the cases the defendant plead No Contest or used an Alford Plea.

Victim Age

Eighty percent of the victims in the adjudicated guilty cases were children under the age of 18, one-third of these children were under the age of 13. The remaining 20% were adult women.

Defendant Age

Sixty percent of the defendants in the adjudicated guilty cases were between the ages of 18 and 30. The remaining 40% were between 31 and 40 years old.

Sentencing

Discounting the four acquittals, the potential sentencing for all sex-crime-related charges was 339 years, plus one life term. After plea-bargainings and trials, the potential sentencing for the 16 cases was reduced to 145.5 years, plus one life term. The actual sentences imposed totaled 114.5 years, plus one life term. Out of these sentences the defendants were given 71.5 years incarceration, plus one life term, with the balance in probation time. Given that one defendant was incarcerated for 40 years and to others for a combined 15 years- that means that 13 defendants were sentenced to an average of 1.3 years incarceration.

Closed Cases

Seventeen Juvenile cases were closed in 1999, and increase of 89% over 1998. There were 4 cases dismissed and no trials in juvenile court during 1999.

Nature of Charge

Of the original charges filed in the petitions 50% were 1st or 2nd degree Criminal Sexual Penetration and 50% were 3rd degree Criminal Sexual Contact.

Plea Bargaining

Fifty-nine percent of the cases were resolved by plea agreements where the original charges were lowered. Four of these plea agreements dropped the sexual felony charges in favor of lower charges of a non-sexual nature, such as Battery or Kidnapping. In 46% of the cases the defendant pled No Contest.

Victim Age

Sixty-nine percent of the victims in the adjudicated guilty cases were children under the age of 13; the remaining 31% were between 13 and 17 years of age.

Defendant Age

Thirty-eight percent of the defendants in the adjudicated guilty cases were 16 and 17 years old. The remaining 62% were 12, 13, and 14 years old.

Sentencings

None of the respondents were incarcerated. 54% received 2 years of probation, with the remaining 46% receiving a 1-year probation or a Consent Decree of 6 months plus 6 months. All of the respondents were evaluated for sex offender issues and 62% were sentenced to the Santa Fe Rape Crisis & Trauma Treatment Center PARE (Preventing Abuse Re-enactment) sexual offender treatment program or private therapy as a condition of probation.


A C C O M P L I S H M E N T S

Going to Court
Since 1997, Court Monitors have attended 72 cases involving sexual offenses in Juvenile Court

Recruiting and Training Volunteers
  • Since 1997, we have held four intensive training sessions for new volunteers. Professors, judges, the staff of the District Attorney's Office and the Public Defenders Office, as well as the staff of the Rape Crisis Center have assisted us in these trainings.
  • In 1998 we produced an official volunteer manual. Court monitoring programs from around the country have requested our manual and it has received positive feedback from these advocacy groups.
  • We have conducted site visits at the STOP and CARE sexual offender treatment programs at the Las Vegas Medical Center, and visited the sex offender treatment program at the New Mexico Boy's School in Springer. Additional meetings have been held with Juvenile Probation, the Domestic Violence Victim's Advocates Program, Adult Probation and Parole, as well as with staff of the Public Defenders Office and the District Attorneys Office and the Rape Crisis Center.
Networking With the Legal and Therapeutic Community
  • Representatives of the Court Monitoring Program participate with several legal and activist organizations that work with victims and sex offenders. Court Monitors attend the regular meetings of Sex Offender Round Table (SORT) and The NM Network of Treatment Providers to contribute out court experience to the issues of victim and sex offender therapy and laws. Currently we are part of a group within SORT and the Network or Treatment Providers working on educating the justice committee of the New Mexico State Legislature on issues regarding Megan's Law and sex offender treatment in new Mexico and other states.
Informing the Community
  • Articles involving our activities and positions have appeared in The New Mexican, the Albuquerque Journal North, and Channel 13.
  • To keep the community informed about the prosecution of sexual violence in District I, The Clipboard is being sent to over 2000 people and agencies, including legislators, activists, government and judicial personnel, therapists, and community centers and libraries.
  • In November, 1998 we co-sponsored with the League of Women Voters, a Forum in which the panel included judges, prosecutors, public defenders, a victim advocate, and a sex offender treatment therapist. A video, "Rape ­ Another Act of Violence" was produced from this event by Court Monitor Kee Meyer, and has been shown throughout the state.
Organizing the National Court Monitoring Effort
  • In October of 1999, we initiated and hosted the first national conference of court monitoring programs in the country. Forty participants representing nineteen programs came to Plaza Resolana de Santa Fe for a three-day round table discussion opportunity. Along with our co-sponsor and mentor-program, WATCH, we arranged for an intensive agenda that covered all aspects of the start-up, organizing, and funding of court monitoring programs. As a result of the success of the event, the Court Monitors Program and WATCH will begin planning a follow-up conference on a larger bases for the year 2001. We're grateful.

back to top