
















 |
   
C O U R T M O N I T O R S P
R O G R A M
Beginnings
The Court Monitors Program was established in 1997 as part of the
ongoing campaign of the Santa Fe Rape Crisis & Trauma Treatment Center and the League
of Women Voters of Santa Fe County to see justice served in cases
of sexual violence. Initially, eight League members, under the leadership
coordinator from the Rape Crisis Center, volunteered to attend, observe
and gather data on every case of felony sexual assault charges in
Rio Arriba, Los Alamos, and Santa Fe Counties. Over the past four
years, Court Monitors, carrying distinctive red clipboards, have attended
over 111 cases of sexual assault in both juvenile and criminal court.
Our team of court observers has grown to 19 and has included men as
well as women. Since 1997, Court Monitors have become a consistent
presence in the First Judicial District courtrooms, appearing at arraignments,
plea hearings, trials, and sentencings. We enthusiastically share
with the community our initial findings and comments based upon this
court experience.
Why Monitor the Courts?
Without public awareness, inconsistencies and problems in the courts
are easily ignored. This can promote a silent permissivness around
the crimes of sexual violence. By being a presence in the courtroom,
the Court Monitors Program hopes to hold the justice system accountable
for how it processes these crimes.
We monitor the courts in order to:
- identify where the changes in the law need to be made
and to work to bring about those legislative changes;
- gather data on all aspects of the criminal court system
and to use that data to offer practical suggestions and solutions
for the improvement of that system;
- promote public awareness about the criminal justice
system and how it delivers justice to both the victim and the
accused in cases of sexual violence. By sharing our courtroom
experience through newsletters, forums, conferences and trainings,
the Court Monitors Program opens the doors of a judicial process
that is rarely seen by the rest of the community, thereby educating
voters and potential jurors;
- maintain a position of neutrality in a process that
is, by its nature, adversarial. In doing so, we remain accessible
to concerned professionals representing all sides of the legal
community for open and frank discussion regarding problems in
the criminal justice system and possible solutions.
For more information regarding the Court Monitors Program
or to become a volunteer,
call Maria Jose Rodriquez Cadiz, Coordinator,
at (505) 988-1951 ext. 28.
O V E R V I E W
In the past two years, 131 females and 9 males went to the St. Vincent
Hospital and SFRCC's Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner/Sexual Assault
Recovery Team (SANE/SART) unit. All reported being sexually assaulted.
Of these victims, 51% we under 18 years of age.
Only 16% of these victim's alleged assailants were indicted in District
I Court in 1998 and 1999. These numbers add local specifics to the
national statistics. Most rapes go unreported; of those that are reported,
fewer than 20% of the cases go to court. The public, therefore, has
little knowledge of the magnitude of the sexual assault problem. We
know that without the reporting of a rape and the subsequent prosecution
of the alleged assailant, perpetrators who victimize the women, children,
and men of our community remain free on our streets and in our homes,
without punishment or treatment.
A total of 88 new sex offense cases were opened and monitored by the
Court Monitors in 1998 and 1999. This is an average of 3.6 cases per
month. In criminal court in 1999 there was a decrease from 1998 of
35% in new cases opened and in juvenile court there was an increase
of 73% in the juvenile cases opened in 1999. At year-end 1999, 28
cases in both crminal and juvenile courts were still in process. In
addition, there were 8 open cases with outstanding warrants, meaning
the defendants are in flight and have not shown up for the scheduled
hearings.
C R I M I N A L C O U R T
Jury Trials
Twenty criminal cases were closed in 1999. Thirty percent of the cases
were brought to trial, an increase of 21% over 1998. In half of the
trials the jury brought back a verdict of not guilty on all counts.
Another case is scheduled to be re-tried after the jury found the
defendant not guilty on one count and a hung jury on the two remaining
counts. In two cases the defendants were found guilty on all counts,
one of whom was sentenced to life because it included a murder in
the first-degree charge. The other defendant was sentenced to 15 years
(with a suspension of 13 years 11 months).
Nature of Charges
Of the original charges filed in the indictments 21% were for 1st
degree Criminal Sexual Penetration, 36% were for 2nd and 3rd degree
Criminal Sexual Penetration, and 43% were for 3rd and 4th degree Criminal
Sexual Contact.
Plea Bargaining
Of the remaining 14 closed cases, 43% were resolved by plea agreements
where the original charges were lowered. Two of these plea agreements
dropped the sexual felony charges in favor of lower charges of a non-sexual
nature, such as Contributing to the Deliquency of a Minor or False
Imprisonment, which are 4th degree felony charges. In 29% of the cases
the defendant plead No Contest or used an Alford Plea.
Victim Age
Eighty percent of the victims in the adjudicated guilty cases were
children under the age of 18, one-third of these children were under
the age of 13. The remaining 20% were adult women.
Defendant Age
Sixty percent of the defendants in the adjudicated guilty cases were
between the ages of 18 and 30. The remaining 40% were between 31 and
40 years old.
Sentencing
Discounting the four acquittals, the potential sentencing for all
sex-crime-related charges was 339 years, plus one life term. After
plea-bargainings and trials, the potential sentencing for the 16 cases
was reduced to 145.5 years, plus one life term. The actual sentences
imposed totaled 114.5 years, plus one life term. Out of these sentences
the defendants were given 71.5 years incarceration, plus one life
term, with the balance in probation time. Given that one defendant
was incarcerated for 40 years and to others for a combined 15 years-
that means that 13 defendants were sentenced to an average of 1.3
years incarceration.
Closed Cases
Seventeen Juvenile cases were closed in 1999, and increase of 89%
over 1998. There were 4 cases dismissed and no trials in juvenile
court during 1999.
Nature of Charge
Of the original charges filed in the petitions 50% were 1st or 2nd
degree Criminal Sexual Penetration and 50% were 3rd degree Criminal
Sexual Contact.
Plea Bargaining
Fifty-nine percent of the cases were resolved by plea agreements where
the original charges were lowered. Four of these plea agreements dropped
the sexual felony charges in favor of lower charges of a non-sexual
nature, such as Battery or Kidnapping. In 46% of the cases the defendant
pled No Contest.
Victim Age
Sixty-nine percent of the victims in the adjudicated guilty cases
were children under the age of 13; the remaining 31% were between
13 and 17 years of age.
Defendant Age
Thirty-eight percent of the defendants in the adjudicated guilty cases
were 16 and 17 years old. The remaining 62% were 12, 13, and 14 years
old.
Sentencings
None of the respondents were incarcerated. 54% received 2 years of
probation, with the remaining 46% receiving a 1-year probation or
a Consent Decree of 6 months plus 6 months. All of the respondents
were evaluated for sex offender issues and 62% were sentenced to the
Santa Fe Rape Crisis & Trauma Treatment Center PARE (Preventing Abuse Re-enactment) sexual
offender treatment program or private therapy as a condition of probation.
A C C O M P L I S H M E N T S
Going to Court
Since 1997, Court Monitors have attended 72 cases involving sexual
offenses in Juvenile Court
Recruiting and Training Volunteers
- Since 1997, we have held four intensive training sessions for new
volunteers. Professors, judges, the staff of the District Attorney's
Office and the Public Defenders Office, as well as the staff of the
Rape Crisis Center have assisted us in these trainings.
- In 1998 we produced an official volunteer manual. Court monitoring
programs from around the country have requested our manual and it
has received positive feedback from these advocacy groups.
- We have conducted site visits at the STOP and CARE sexual offender
treatment programs at the Las Vegas Medical Center, and visited the
sex offender treatment program at the New Mexico Boy's School in Springer.
Additional meetings have been held with Juvenile Probation, the Domestic
Violence Victim's Advocates Program, Adult Probation and Parole, as
well as with staff of the Public Defenders Office and the District
Attorneys Office and the Rape Crisis Center.
Networking With the Legal and Therapeutic
Community
-
Representatives of the Court Monitoring Program participate with
several legal and activist organizations that work with victims and
sex offenders. Court Monitors attend the regular meetings of Sex Offender
Round Table (SORT) and The NM Network of Treatment Providers to contribute
out court experience to the issues of victim and sex offender therapy
and laws. Currently we are part of a group within SORT and the Network
or Treatment Providers working on educating the justice committee
of the New Mexico State Legislature on issues regarding Megan's Law
and sex offender treatment in new Mexico and other states.
Informing the Community
-
Articles involving our activities and positions have appeared in
The New Mexican, the Albuquerque Journal North, and Channel 13.
- To keep the community informed about the prosecution of sexual
violence in District I, The Clipboard is being sent to
over 2000 people and agencies, including legislators, activists,
government and judicial personnel, therapists, and community centers
and libraries.
- In November, 1998 we co-sponsored with the League of Women Voters,
a Forum in which the panel included judges, prosecutors, public defenders,
a victim advocate, and a sex offender treatment therapist. A video,
"Rape Another Act of Violence" was produced from this event by Court
Monitor Kee Meyer, and has been shown throughout the state.
Organizing the National Court Monitoring Effort
- In October of 1999, we initiated and hosted the first national
conference of court monitoring programs in the country. Forty
participants representing nineteen programs came to Plaza Resolana
de Santa Fe for a three-day round table discussion opportunity.
Along with our co-sponsor and mentor-program, WATCH, we arranged
for an intensive agenda that covered all aspects of the start-up,
organizing, and funding of court monitoring programs. As a result
of the success of the event, the Court Monitors Program and WATCH
will begin planning a follow-up conference on a larger bases for
the year 2001. We're grateful.
back to top |
|